The Ron Paul Counter-Revolution

Many libertarians laud the American colonists for instigating a revolution against the British crown, and rightly so. I don't see any more effective redress for the time and circumstances. But I have begun to think that continuing such an analogy to the Ron Paul movement is in error.

Can we really call this the Ron Paul Revolution? I say this is a Counter-Revolution. What is revolutionary about bringing back the traditions of freedom and limited government? I say it is revolutionary to call for destroying the Constitution and starting wars to "democratize" those countries we view as uncivilized.

Garet Garrett put it best in the opening of The Revolution Was:

"There are those who still think they are holding the pass against a revolution that may be coming up the road. But they are gazing in the wrong direction. The revolution is behind them. It went by in the Night of Depression, singing songs to freedom."

We are here to take back what is rightfully ours; no more New Deal-style socialism; no more Wilsonian wars for "democracy"; we want authentic prosperity and lasting peace.

What brought this all together for me was reading a blog post by John Cochran on the Mises Institute Blog. He posted a poem by Patrick Barrington, entitled "I Want to be a Consumer":

I Want to be a Consumer

"And what do you mean to be?"
The kind old Bishop said
As he took the boy on his ample knee
And patted his curly head.
"We should all of us choose a calling
To help Society's plan;
Then what to you mean to be, my boy,
When you grow to be a man?"

"I want to be a Consumer,"
The bright-haired lad replied
As he gazed into the Bishop's face
In innocence open-eyed.
"I've never had aims of a selfish sort,
For that, as I know, is wrong.
I want to be a Consumer, Sir,
And help the world along."

"I want to be a Consumer
And work both night and day,
For that is the thing that's needed most,
I've heard Economists say,
I won't just be a Producer,
Like Bobby and James and John;
I want to be a Consumer, Sir,
And help the nation on."

"But what do you want to be?"
The Bishop said again,
"For we all of us have to work," said he,
"As must, I think, be plain.
Are you thinking of studying medicine
Or taking a Bar exam?"
"Why, no!" the bright-haired lad replied
As he helped himself to jam.

"I want to be a Consumer
And live in a useful way;
For that is the thing that is needed most,
I've heard Economists say.
There are too many people working
And too many things are made.
I want to be a Consumer, Sir,
And help to further trade."

"I want to be a Consumer
And do my duty well;
For that is the thing that is needed most,
I've heard Economists tell.
I've made up my mind," the lad was heard,
As he lit a cigar, to say;
"I want to be a Consumer, Sir,
And I want to begin today."

The true revolutionaries are those who inverted the entire discipline of economics. The Austrian economists fought for decades to show that prosperity can only be attained through production, savings, and capital accumulation.

The post-Keynesian and neoclassical economists of today would have you believe that printing money and spending it is the true path to a world of wealth. That is simply wrong; it is, however, the true path to depression and financial disarray.

I could be mistaken, but I do not see what is revolutionary about returning to sound economics, limited government, and a humble foreign policy. We had it once and they stole it from us. Let's win it back.

Long Live the Counter-Revolution!