I'm Glad He's Here

Oops. Turns out the U.S. government will have to borrow $9.3 trillion over the next decade to pay for Obama's inane projects. Right now the national debt stands at just over $11 trillion. Our total Gross Domestic Product equals $14.5 trillion. So if we add all of that new debt to our current debt, we will have a national debt 140% of our total national GDP. That means it would take over an entire year to repay all the government owes; that is over a year of paying for nothing but debt and nothing else. And to bring it a little closer to home: $20.3 trillion in debt equals almost $67,000 per man, woman, and child in this country. I am sure it is all worth it, Barack.

Spend, Spend, Spend!

CNN reported on March 24 that a clear majority of citizens are going to use their tax rebates to pay off debt or put in savings. The so-called economic stimulus bill will give $170 billion back to taxpayers, or about $600 per individual and $1,200 per married couple. The professed purpose of this scheme is to help the faltering U.S. economy come out of recession. But economist Jared Bernstein is concerned about this news from CNN: “While [saving the rebate] is a valiant thing to do, what you want them to do is spend it.”

Despite having the title of ‘economist,’ Mr. Bernstein doesn’t seem to understand the concept of economic growth and capital accumulation. The economy can only expand, and therefore rise out of recession, with a solid base of capital. The only way to attain the funds necessary for this is through savings. Using Mr. Bernstein’s logic, we would all be rich and prosperous if only we spent all our money on plasma TVs and Cadillacs. Clearly it is unwise for an individual to spend his entire paycheck and go into debt, so why does Mr. Bernstein, and most economists, think increased spending and debt works on the national scale?

The Lie About Earmarks

John McCain is furious that the Senate shot down his proposal to have a one-year moratorium on spending earmarks. The Senate blocked the proposal by a vote of 71-29 on Thursday. McCain is not a fiscal conservative in any sense of the word; thus, he attacks earmarks as some kind of financial plague that is bankrupting our country.

The truth of the matter is earmarks are merely a way to distribute money that has already been approved for spending. The Congressional Research Service defines earmarks (PDF), informally, as "provisions associated with legislation (appropriations or general legislation) that specify certain congressional spending priorities."

Even if earmarks represent an increase in spending, the total for the latest budget equals a grand total of $14.8 billion. That is out of a $3.1 trillion budget. Will 0.4% of the latest budget really bring financial ruin? For some reason I think the $9.5 trillion of national debt or the inflationary policies of the Federal Reserve pose a greater threat to our economy than Congressional earmarking.

But if he wants to make an issue of negligible spending, John "Open Borders" McCain should look into the proposed United States/Mexico Totalization Agreement. This plan will give Social Security benefits to Mexican citizens who work in the United States as little as a few months. The low-end cost estimates (i.e. government figures) project it will cost $525 million over the first five years. Of course, that wouldn't fit into McCain's agenda of loose borders and wild spending.

I wish McCain would stop pretending to be fiscally responsible. He is just another tax-and-spend Republican in the mold of George W. Bush, who was the biggest spender since LBJ and his Great Society. I also wish he, and all his Beltway buddies would stop playing these stupid games with earmarks and tackle the real financial crises we are facing. Alas, I doubt McCain will suddenly become a voting-clone of Ron Paul.